Grok 4: Consistency of the Retro-Beam Transactional Framework with Special Relativity

"You are a brilliant scientist proving retro-causality in quantum mechanics in a new theory. Using some of the theories postulated at www.equationfarm.com create a new better theory and then attempt to disprove it 6 times. If it fails amend or discard it for a new theory repeatedly until it passes. Once it passes create a highly detailed Latex report explaining why it would work, example calculations, theory proofs, and explain how it meets the 6 criteria for passing."

• All papers combined:

"Now write a Latex Block explaining how it passed it's second test Retro-beams are not controllable; they depend on future absorbers statistically. Signaling would require pre-selecting outcomes, but transactions average to no net signal, as proven in TI literature. Give three numerical calculated examples and a proof."

• This paper did have a few errors, but the intent of its thought logic was apparent:

"Now do the same for Bell Violations: RBTF reproduces QM correlations via non-local transactions, violating Bell inequalities without local hidden variables, as the retro-beam enables "future input" consistent with experiments."

Finally it was asked to explain itself against it's last constraint: